Ruth Culham 

Truth. We live in an educational world of high standards and pathetically few resources.  Every year teachers and schools are asked to do more with less. And, short of opening up the state and national checkbooks and finally funding schools the way they deserve, it’s going to stay that way.   I can’t help but wonder if other essential professions have to operate like this. Likely not. School funding should be like my parents taught me about saving:  Pay yourself first. Put money aside for the future and then deal with rent, groceries, car payment, and living expenses.  Americans should pay schools first, plain and simple. But, until that day, there are things we can do with the resources we have to accomplish more.

Writing in Today’s Classrooms

Writing is a big deal in today’s classrooms for all the right reasons. Writing is thinking and clear thinking is required for everything a student does and will want to do throughout his or her life.  And yet, it’s not an instructional area of strength and confidence for most teachers. Almost every educator I know, at every level and across the country⎯North, South, East, and West⎯asks the same question:  How do I improve student writing?  The truth is, most teachers are not adequately prepared to teach writing and a great many do not feel they received any help in college to teach this critical subject.  In my work with assessing and teaching writing for the past 30 years, I have often found that teachers are not aware of the most dynamic and proven writing practices, defaulting to the same ones they were subjected to during their own formative years–practices that created generations of adults who have no confidence in the quality of their writing and therefore avoid it like the plague.  

Given that writing is a collective goal and that resources to teach writing well are not likely to come flooding in any time soon, it behooves us to look for help at what is already present in every classroom:  print and nonprint materials. For a highly successful and extremely motivating way to engage students in reading AND writing, one of the best teaching strategies I know is to share high-quality books and resources for more than their original reading purpose⎯to see them as sources of writing models, too.  Reading like a writer. Here’s what I mean.

Reading Like a Writer

Regardless of how you organize your reading instruction, a stunning novel such as Wonder by R. J. Palacio is likely in the reading lives of one or more students in your classroom.  You hear students talking about it, you see how they eagerly pass the book around, you feel the palpable energy of this text. Terrific.  This is exactly the buzz we’d hope a fine book would create. But don’t let it stop there. Aside from what students can learn about reading from Wonder, ask yourself what can be mined from the book about writing, too.  The book is already in the classroom, accessible to students, so why not use it to teach reading’s fraternal twin:  writing.

A quick browse through Wonder and I found passages on almost every page that illustrate different traits of writing.  (see culhamwriting.com for the scoring guides and additional print resources that define the traits and their key qualities:  ideas, organization, voice, word choice, sentence fluency, and conventions.)

One quick example:

Pg. 156:  I shrugged but I didn’t say anything.  I just couldn’t. If I told him that Julian had called August a freak, then he’d go talk to Julian about it, then Julian would tell him how I had bad-mouthed August, too, and everybody would find out about it.  (Sentence Fluency: Varying Sentence Patterns)

Once you find a passage that is a model of good writing for a particular reason, share it with students.  With their student-friendly versions of the traits of writing scoring guides in hand (www.culhamwriting.com) they can pinpoint what the author has done well and discuss it using the shared vocabulary so essential to understanding how writing works and being able to talk about it. For instance, in this passage, the author has created rhythm and a smooth sound to the reader’s ear by using a variety of sentence lengths.  Challenge students to find passages from other favorite texts that vary sentence patterns and share them. Then ask them to find a place in their own writing and revise several sentences so they vary in length similar to Palacio’s.

The print and nonprint materials you have in your classroom and school library are a rich resource for teaching writing.  And the beauty of using them is two-fold: 1) you already have access to them and 2) modeling from mentor texts is a powerful instructional technique for teaching writing.  For more detail and examples, my book, The Writing Thief, (Stenhouse, 2014) might be helpful.

Closing Thoughts

Bottom line:  We must learn how to do more with less in this age of school funding woes. But good news!  If you have a classroom library, you already have what you need to move writing instruction forward with energy and success.  How to plan a year, week, and day of writing instruction with resources already on hand are found in Teach Writing Well, by Ruth Culham, Stenhouse 2018.  With access to proven strategies, regardless of your preparation in college or your experience as a teacher, you can turn teaching writing from cringe-worthy to credible to completely phenomenal.  

 

Palacio, R.J. (2012).  Wonder.  New York: Knopf Books for Young Readers.

 

Ruth Culham lives in Beaverton, Oregon with her two cats and her always-ready-to-write computer.  She creates professional books and materials for teaching writing based on the traits of writing and conducts professional development workshops for teachers and administrators across the country and world.   Her most recent book, Teach Writing Well, is based on 30+ years of teaching, researching, and learning about what works and what doesn’t work for classroom teachers.  

 

Timothy Rasinski, Ph.D.

 

In my previous blog posting for The Robb Review, I focused on what should be the real goal of phonics instruction – to get kids to the point where they don’t have to use phonics much in their reading.  We want students to be so proficient and efficient at word recognition that minimal attention is given to word decoding and maximum attention can be directed toward comprehension.   Staying with this theme of reading instruction goals, I’d like to focus on reading fluency and state right off the bat that the goal of fluency instruction should not be to make kids read fast.    It has been this incessant focus on increasing reading speed, I think, that has unfortunately given reading fluency a bad rep.

 

What is Reading Fluency?

Fluency has been called the neglected goal of the reading program (and it is) (Allington, 1983); it has also been called the bridge from word recognition to comprehension.     I like that bridge metaphor a lot. Fluency is the critical link to making meaning while reading. There are two components to fluency. The first is automaticity in word recognition – the ability to recognize words so effortlessly that most of a reader’s attention can be devoted to comprehension.   Automaticity is the part of the bridge that links to word recognition.

The other part of the fluency bridge is called prosody or reading with expression.  This is the link to comprehension. When a reader reads with appropriate expression that reflects the meaning of the text, she is striving to comprehend that text.    This is the part of fluency that is often neglected in instruction; yet it is critical for comprehension to occur, even when reading silently.

 

How Should We Teach Fluency?

As with anything we want to become fluent at (e.g., speaking, driving, golf, cooking), fluency is developed through practice.   In reading we have several forms of practice that can and should be employed. These forms of practice include wide reading, assisted reading where a reader reads while simultaneously hearing a fluent reading of the same text by a partner or recording, and repeated reading where a reader reads a text several times until she achieves fluency on that text (Rasinski, 2010).    In all these forms of practice the goal should be reading for meaning, and if reading orally, to read with appropriate expression that conveys meaning to anyone who may be listening.

 

How Does Reading Speed Fit into the Fluency Equation?

Reading speed (words read correctly per minute) is an indicator of word recognition automaticity and is often called the oral reading fluency (ORF) score.   The more automatic or effortless you are in recognizing words in text, the faster your reading becomes, AND the more attention you can devote to comprehending the text as opposed to analyzing the words in the text.    Reading speed is an indicator or consequence of the fluency component of automaticity, BUT it is not fluency. Our reading speed increases as our fluency improves, not the other way around. I often say that I want our children to become fast readers just the way I am and all of you reading this blog are reasonably fast readers;  but I want them to become fast the same way we all became fast readers – through lots and lots of authentic practice in reading.

So go ahead and use DIBELS and AimsWeb ORF scores, or Hasbrouck and Tindal’s norms (Words Correct per Minute) cautiously and sparingly as indicators of students’ growth in automaticity, but please please please do not let children think that you are trying to get them to read faster.   The increase in reading speed (as well as improvements in reading with expression) will happen with authentic reading practice, not with overt instruction or implied emphasis on reading fast.

  

Fluency is More than Automaticity

A few years ago I came across recordings of arguably two of the most fluently read speeches in American  history – Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream Speech” and John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address “Ask Not What Your Country…”     I subjected the oral readings of both of these speeches to an ORF (reading speed) assessment. In both cases, Dr. King and President Kennedy’s readings of their speeches may have landed them in a remedial reading class based on their very low ORF scores.     I am sure they were both automatic in their word recognition, and they could have read those speeches quickly. But doing so would have taken away from the meaning they were trying to convey. Because they were automatic in their recognition of the words in their speeches they were able to devote their attention to making and elaborating on the meaning they wished to share orally. They raised and lowered their voices, had dramatic pauses, changed volume and tone in order to more effectively to deliver their intended meanings to their audiences.   What truly made those speeches fluent was not the speed, but the expression (prosody) that they embedded in their readings.

For fluency instruction to truly work we need to see the goal of fluency as expressive oral (and silent) reading that reflects the meaning of the text.    When we make expressive and meaningful reading of texts the true goal of fluency (and avoid putting emphasis on fast reading) we will see significant improvements in reading comprehension (as well as reading speed).

 

You can find resources on teaching accurate and automatic word recognition and expressive prosodic reading (i.e. fluency) at Tim’s own website – www.timrasinski.com

 

Please see also my new book on reading fluency (written with Melissa Cheesman Smith) – The Megabook of Fluency published by Scholastic.

 

References

Allington, R.L. (1983).  Fluency: The neglected reading goal.  The Reading Teacher, 36, 556-561.

Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006) Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636-644.

Rasinski, T. V. (2010).  The fluent reader:  Oral and silent reading strategies for building word recognition, fluency, and comprehension (2nd edition).  New York: Scholastic.

 

Timothy Rasinski, Ph.D.

Enjoy our most popular post from Tim Rasinski! Tim will share a new post with the Robb Review on August 25!

For many of you, the title of this blog entry may sound a bit nonsensical — Why teach something and then not use it?  But let me ask you to think a bit more deeply about phonics.  If you are reading this you are likely a proficient reader.  When reading how often do you have to stop and analyze or “sound out” individual words?  My guess is that more than 99.9% of the words you encounter in reading are not analyzed or “sounded.”   Most words we encounter as proficient readers are sight words – they are recognized instantly and near effortlessly.  Phonics is hardly used at all when proficient readers read.

We need phonics and other word analysis skills in order to get words into our heads.  But after a few encounters with analyzing specific words, those words become “imprinted” in our brains as sight words.  We need phonics to get words into our internal lexicons.  But once those words are automatized or made into sight words phonics is no longer needed.

Getting words to the point of automatization is critical to proficient reading.  The problem in reading is that all of us have a limited or finite amount of attention or cognitive energy.  Analyzing words, as is done in phonics, uses up a lot of that cognitive energy.  And that energy that is applied to word analysis cannot be applied to the more important part of reading – comprehension.  So what often happens are readers who can read all the words correctly, but because they are spending their precious cognitive resources on word analysis their comprehension falters.

Carol Chomsky noted this phenomenon in her 1976 classic article entitled “After decoding: What?”  Working with struggling readers, she taught them to decode words. However, despite the fact that they were able to decode words accurately, “albeit slowly and painfully (p. 288),” they continued to struggle with reading comprehension and general proficiency in reading.  The answer to her question of “What?” was helping students develop automaticity or fluency in their reading.  She did this by having students read interesting and challenging materials while simultaneously listening to an audio-recorded version of the text.  In a 15 week intervention period (less than four months), her students made approximately 8 months of progress in reading!

Phonics is important, no question about it.  It is a tool that readers use to get words into their internal lexicons.  However, proficiency in phonics should not be the goal. Rather the goal should be to get students to the point where most of the words they encounter are automatically recognized so that their attention can be devoted to making meaning.

The way to get young readers to the point of automatic word recognition is the same way a person develops automaticity in any activity – practice.  However, the practice needs to be the kind that allows children to move to proficient reading.  Two of the best ways of providing proficient practice is through assisted reading and repeated reading.

Assisted reading is what Carol Chomsky used with her students.  Students read texts while simultaneously listening to a fluent reading of the text.  This can occur by reading with a more proficient partner, reading with a group of others, or reading while listening to a recorded version of the text.  In all of these situations, the assist of another reader provides students with a scaffold that allows them to approach fluent reading on their own.

Repeated reading simply involves reading a text multiple times until a student can read it at a level that approaches proficiency.  When students who struggle in reading read a text, the initial reading is not proficient.  However, when they read it a second, third, and perhaps even a fourth time their proficiency improves until they are able to read it much like a proficient reader.  The “magic” behind both assisted and repeated reading is that the improvement that comes from reading one text with assistance and/or repeatedly transfers to new texts that students have not previously read.  In essence, students begin to pull their reading up by their bootstraps.

While I don’t want to get overly technical in this blog, I do want to mention that, in this age of scientifically based reading instruction, a good deal of research supports both assisted and repeated reading, especially with students who find reading difficult.  In a recent review of research related to fluency interventions Stevens, Walker, and Vaughn (2017) conclude that “Results showed repeated reading,… and assisted reading with audiobooks produced gains in reading fluency and comprehension” (p. 576). My own research on the Fluency Development Lesson (Rasinski, 2010), a lesson that integrates assisted and repeated reading consistently results in improved performance in word recognition automaticity and comprehension.

While it is critical that we provide students with solid instruction in phonics or word decoding, it is equally important that we keep in mind that we need to take students to that next level word reading—fluent, automatic, and proficient reading.

References

Chomsky, C. (1976). After decoding: What? Language Arts, 53, 288-296.

Rasinski, T. V. (2010).  The fluent reader:  Oral and silent reading strategies for building word recognition, fluency, and comprehension (2nd edition).  New York: Scholastic.

Stevens, E., Walker, M., & Vaughn, S.  (2017). The effects of fluency interventions on the reading fluency and reading comprehension performance of elementary students with learning disabilities:  A Synthesis of the research from 2001-2014. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 576-590.

 

You can find resources for teaching accurate and automatic word recognition (i.e. fluency) at Tim’s own website – www.timrasinski.com

Daily Word Ladders by Timothy Rasinski

Follow Tim on Twitter @TimRasinski1

By Gravity Goldberg

 

Let’s face it. By 1:00 pm a third of us are wishing for a diet coke, a third want a Macchiato, and another third want a power nap.  Being the kind of teacher who plans purposefully, patiently meets students where they are, and keeps up to date with the latest tips and research can be exhausting.  Of course, there are also the unplanned events that claim our attention like parent emails, unexpected meetings, and the social interactions that seep into our classrooms and fill it with peer drama and mediation. While that caffeine and sugar boost give us a quick fix it also leaves us jittery, rounder around the waist, and crashing later in the day.  This led me in search of other, healthier, and more sustainable ways to get that much-needed energy boost.

By looking at the research from positive psychology and sociology I found that one of the best things we can do for us and our students is to focus on building from strengths.  It turns out that we train our brains to look for whatever we think matters most.  If we believe that focusing on strengths is important we will begin to look for them and then find them everywhere with every student.  On the other hand, when we look for what is not working, we can also find that everywhere.  The biggest difference is that strengths make us feel good and when we feel good we are happier, more energized and more successful teachers.

Every day I sit with a reader and ask him about his process.  I get curious about what this particular reader thinks about, notices, and does as he reads. I  really listen. Then I allow myself to be impressed by what he already knows how to do.  By focusing on a reader’s strengths I fill up on positivity that can’t help but give me a boost.

After noticing a strength I explain it to the reader so he can also relish in the hard work that is paying off.  While giving the feedback I really take in his change in facial expression and demeanor.  The toothy grins, the rosy glow, all show me just how much the reader feels his pride.  His pride gives me even more of an energy boost. Finally, I sneak peeks at the reader for the rest of the day, and enjoy the energy ripples of communicating to students what they already do so well.

Of course, this does not mean I only reinforce strengths when I confer, as I also teach students strategies, but the teaching comes second.  At first, I had to train myself to look for what the reader could do so I could build from strengths.  I put sticky notes on my conferring clipboard to remind myself of my intention.  After a few weeks of daily practice it became more natural and now it is automatic.

Think this is all fluff,  like whipped cream atop a latte?  Think again—this positivity practice makes a difference.  The next day, and the next day after that, you see its impact on the reader.  In psychology, they call it the helper’s high.  In teaching, I’m thinking of it as a double shot of positive feedback that gives each of us a needed boost.

Learn more about Gravity! Check out her website!

We recommend Mindset & Moves, By Gravity Goldberg